Back To: The Tyranny of Materiality
Updated August 21, 2000
"Steve / Stephanie" Frank Yazum [right, standing] [James, left, sitting]
Friday, March 31, 2000
I found out today that someone slit Steve's throat Friday March 24, 2000 . . . Steve was the kindest, most polite sweetheart . . . I got to know Steve over the past four years watching him/her grow and become independent . . . s/he was a he though felt comfortable dressing as "female" . . . no, s/he came alive as Stephanie . . . s/he was lovely: thin, nice legs, dripping with style, meticulous about his/her appearance and damn it: beautiful from the very core of self . . . his/her killer(s) are unknown, as well as motive(s), though it appears as if cross dressing is considered motivation at this point in the investigation . . . cultural intolerance murdered Steve, or, in the very least, robbed him/her of his/her identity . . . how exasperatingly stupid / pointless / inane can gender intolerance be? Why must we all be defined by our genitalia? Can't we just fucking be ourselves regardless of penis and vagina? I wish I had an image of Steve as Stephanie, though, I do, way inside the convolutions of my brain . . . no matter what s/he appeared as s/he was wonderful . . . isn't that obvious?
There is a $5,000 reward for information regarding Steve's murder . . . call 518-382-5245.
From the Albany Times Union Site:
"Schenectady -- A 28-year-old Becker Street man was charged Thursday night with the knifing death of an acquaintance last month in the victim's Stockade area apartment. David Bronson of 1834 Becker St. "made admissions'' of his involvement in the crime as he was being questioned by city detectives, said Detective Sgt. Al Buzanowski. Robbery was the apparent motive for the killing, the sergeant said, but police withheld comment on how much cash was taken from Frank Yazum, 40, that night."
By Bobbi Jo Williams
There’s one more story I have to write. I wish I could
change the ending, but the truth of it won’t
allow me. Nor can I change the setting or the characters.
I can only report the events. The truth of
it binds me to it’s conclusion. So listen. Please. And
try to understand why I had to tell you this...
this last story.
She weighed less than a hundred pounds; ninety-five, I
think she told me once--a size four or six.
Such a little girl. Her Polish features gave her the
look of a doll--not a Barbie or Chatty Kathy, but
the kind of dolls you find at European fairs, with colorful
ethnic outfits. She wore glasses too, her
eyes being very weak, but that affliction was minor when
put beside her epilepsy and diabetes. Oh
yes. You might say she was quite a case. But you’d never
know it by her demeanor.
“You make the best Alabama Slammer I’ve ever had,” she’d
tell the bartender, then wink and
excavate the contents of her purse to find her money.
“I’ve got it here somewhere, ” she’d say.
She’d bring her drink to the table and we’d sit and talk,
though most times she would talk and I’d
play mom and listen.
“Oh yes,” she told me one evening not long before it happened.
“I’m in love.” And she batted her
eyelashes and grinned like a 9 year old who’d just got
a note form the little boy sitting behind her
in elementary school.
“Is it mutual?” I asked.
“Of course,” she said without hesitation. ”I’m sure it is... well... pretty sure...”
I waited while she sipped her drink.
“She has a child... a seven year old, and that kind of
gets in the way of our spending a lot of time
together.” She looked toward the door. “She said she’d
come by tonight.”
“So,” I said. “It’s a girl.”
She smiled. “Yes,” she said. “And no. She’s ‘f’ to ‘m’.
Or she’s going to be. I mean, she, er... he, just
started hormones.”
“Ahhh... “
“So it’s perfect!” she exclaimed. “She’ll be ‘he’ and I’ll be ‘she.’”
“Eventually,” I said.
“Yes!” she squealed. “Eventually.”
I smiled and raised my glass. “To love,” I said.
She lifted her glass and repeated the words, “ To love,”
she said, then sighed, the way that smitten
schoolgirls do.
But Stephanie was not a schoolgirl. She turned forty just
this year. Finally, on her way to
becoming herself at last, she was happier, she said,
than she had ever been. For all those years
before she had lived with parents who protected her,
wouldn’t let her go; the sickly child, the child
with disabilities, the child who remains a child in their
parents eyes. But why, they asked, did she
have to make matters worse with... ‘this.’
“I don’t think they really understand,” she explained.
“My mother calls me ‘ queer’ and ‘gay’ and
says I should stop being so foolish.”
“Maybe you should just tell them to stay out of your life,” I tell her.
She doesn’t respond to that. “They came to my apartment last week and told me it was too messy.”
“Did you ever think of moving out of town?” I ask.
She laughed uncomfortably. “They pay the rent,” she said.
Of course, I thought, that’s how she can afford to live
there, in an older, more elegant part of
town, made up mostly of restored houses from the 1700’s.
Not something a file clerk could afford.
“I don’t mind,” she said. “They love me, you know.”
“I’m sure they do.”
“They just don’t understand.”
“Who does?” I asked.
She shrugged, then took another sip from her glass.
“I want you to come,” she told me one night. “This Saturday... at the pub.”
“You’re in the show?” I asked, almost disbelieving.
She nodded vigorously, her little head bobbing up and
down like one of those dogs in the back of
car. “I haven’t made up my mind yet,” she said. “I want
to do Shania.”
“Shania Twain,” I confirmed.
“Either ‘I Feel Like A Woman’ or ‘Don’t even think about
it!’” She paused, then asked “What do
you think?”
I smiled. “Sorry, I said. “I’m not much of a country music fan.”
“Oh... no... no” she said, shaking her head so that the
page boy wig shook from side to side.
“Shania’s not country really. She’s pop.”
“Ok,” I said. “Regardless. I don’t listen.”
“Well, you should,” she said, admonishingly. “I don’t
need a shrink to tell me what I think,” she
sang. “That’s one of her lines; good stuff.”
“Saturday,” I said.
“Probably not ‘til eleven o’clock. They always start the shows late.”
I arrived at the pub around ten o’clock. Stephanie was
already there, weaving in and out of the
crowd, like a mouse traversing a maze. I tagged her as
she slipped by.
“Hey... when do you go on?” I asked.
“I’m fourth,” she said. “It’s because I’m new, I guess.”
“Fourth’s not bad,” I said.
“Out of four?” she asked.
I smiled. “Well, you know,” I said “ in show business, the star is always the last act.”
“Really?”
I nodded. “Really.”
“Hmmm,” she murmured, then grinned. “ I have to get ready,” she said, and scurried away.
I ordered a drink and chose a seat at the bar with a good
view of the stage (a large plywood plank
laid on top of the pool table at the back of the room).
After a while, the bar lights dimmed and a
single light came up on the ‘stage.’ From somewhere out
of the crowd, a voice announced the first
performer.
It was the usual lip-synching. The three ‘girls’ performing
ahead of her were, at the very least,
semi-professional. You could tell they had done it before
and knew how to work the crowd. (Those gathered around the stage
would lean forward as the performer bent down to accept their
tips.)
At first, Stephanie’s music didn’t cue up properly. Standing
there, in the bright light, her
vulnerability became painfully obvious. She was shaking;
her arms moved awkwardly, like a moth
in a flame, and the usual problems she had with the high
heels now were compounded by her
nervousness. But she forced a smile and when the music
suddenly started she jumped into the
song, unleashing the energy that had been pent up by
her nervousness.
“No inhibitions-make no conditions; Get a little outta
line, I ain’t gonna act politically correct; I
only wanna have a good time?"
As she sang and moved she stared upward, over our heads,
her eyes transfixed, it seemed, on
something we couldn’t see, something she was feeling.
And the contrast, between that look and
the awkward, nearly clumsy way she moved about, took
the crowd aback.
“The best thing about being a woman,” she sang, “Is the
prerogative to have a little fun and... “
now she looked down at the crowd, “Man! I feel like a
woman!”
Everyone hooted and cheered at that last line and Stephanie
grinned broadly. She WAS having a
good time. At that moment, she WAS Stephanie; she WAS
the star.
As she was helped off the stage, I slipped off the bar stool and moved to intercept her.
“How was it?” she asked.
“It was great,” I said. “Just great."
“Well,” she said, “you know... I think I could have done
a little more. You know. Like maybe... at
the opening, but they screwed up the cue.”
“No problem,” I said. “You did just fine.”
She squeezed my hand “Thanks,” she said.
The last time I saw her was at the Tri-Ess meeting, which
isn’t ever a meeting at all, but just an
excuse to go to one of the nicer bars and get together
with other girls. I had been there a while
when she showed up.
“Hi Stephanie,” one of the other girls said. “How’s it going?”
She frowned, tipped her head to one side and closed her eyes. “OK... I guess.”
When she bought her drink I heard her tell the bartender “You make the best Alabama Slammer I’ve ever had.” Then she picked it up and walked over to my table.
“You look very nice,” I said. “I like that suit.”
“Sixty dollars,” she volunteered. “I always get the bargains.”
“I know,” I said. “And if I were your size, I’d get them too.”
She laughed. “I used to hate being small,” she said. “Small
boys get picked on. But now it’s an
asset. You know?”
I nodded.
“How’s the girlfriend... or boyfriend?” I asked.
Her expression changed. “We broke up,” she said. “He said he didn’t have time for a relationship.”
I said nothing. I’ve never known how to respond to news
like that. I knew that anything I said
would sound cliched. And I thought to myself, ‘if someone
cares about you enough, they make the
time for the relationship.’ Finally I said simply “I’m
sorry to hear that.”
“Oh well,” she said. “At least she,... er he, didn’t lead me on.”
I changed the subject then, trying to get onto lighter
things. And that seemed to work. After a
while, she asked where I was going after the meeting.
“Well,” I said, “seeing as this isn’t really going to be a meeting, I’m not sure.”
“I’m going to the pub,” she said. “ If you’d like to come along... “
I nodded. “Sure,” I said. “That sounds fine.”
We finished our drinks, put on our coats, and said goodbye to the others.
“Where ya goin?” Karen asked.
“Just over to the pub,” I replied.
“Oh... well, maybe we’ll see you there.?"
At the pub, we were greeted warmly by the bartender and
a couple of the regulars. (They knew
Stephanie by name now.) We slipped out of our coats and
ordered drinks.
It was a Saturday night, but there weren’t as many people
there as I expected. Then again, this
town has been dying over the last twenty years. The major
employer has left it with very little and
the population is, generally, much older. It’s not the
best venue for a gay bar. To a great extent, all
that’s left is the dregs, left-overs unable to leave.
But the bartender and owner are friendly and
most of the patrons leave us alone.
Stephanie liked to play pool. After a short while she
announced that she was going to find a game
and withdrew to the back where the pool table (the same
one that had been the stage a few weeks
earlier) was situated.
I sipped my drink and chatted with the bartender. None
of the other girls showed up, but the bar’s manager came over and talked
with me for a while. When at last I’d finished my drink, I looked
around for Stephanie. Because of her epilepsy she couldn’t
drive and I’d given her rides home
before.. I put on my coat and took a few steps toward
the center of the room and finally spotted
her.
She was in the back, in the farthest corner, in the arms
of a man I’d seen playing pool with her.
They were kissing.
I paused, considering if I should interrupt. And as I
stood, not realizing I was staring, I heard
Shania ’s voice singing “And I’m not lonely anymore at
night; And he don’t know only he can
make it right.”
I could see that Stephanie was in her world. It was still
the world of the little girl, caught now in
the schoolyard by the little boy whose friends had dared
him to kiss her. The bar, the noise, the
people around her didn’t matter. She was being loved.
Who was I to intrude? I turned to leave and
caught the eye of the bartender who was staring as well.
He raised his eyebrows and tipped his
head to the side. I tossed off a small wave, headed for
the door, and never saw Stephanie again.
Reprinted by permission of the author. 'One Last Story'
is also included in the collection 'Me and
Bobbi and the Girls,' available from Xlibiris
Publishing and online at amazon.com.
Copyright 2000, Bobbi Jo Williams. Used
with permission.
Ahhhh . . . the Death Penalty may be a factor . . .
Gaining a Daughter: a Father's Transgendered Tale
By LENNARD J. DAVIS
I look around and find myself, strangely enough, in the
women's lingerie section of the Kmart in an upstate New York town. I am
with my 19-year-old son, who is comparison shopping for a pair of black
tights. Some farm ladies are regarding us with dubious glances. My
son asks if I think medium is too
large for him. He stands at about 5 feet 11 inches.
I really have no idea what will fit him. Trying to be helpful, I suggest
that he might want to wear the fishnet stockings, which seem to me a bit
more goth, but he sticks with the regular ones. Then we move on to the
cosmetics section for lipstick and hair dye. As I help him pick out a L'Oreal
shade called Parisian Black, I wonder to myself how I got here.
How indeed? A few days earlier, my son had arrived back from his first year at college. The following morning, he sat me down at the kitchen table and announced that he had a big thing to tell his mother and father. My wife was on the telephone, and as we waited for her to finish talking, my son whispered, "I'm getting married." Then he added, "No, just kidding." He was jumpy with nervous intensity. When my wife sat down, he spoke: "I've been thinking about this for a long time, and I wanted to tell you -- I'm transgendered!" He looked pleased with himself and somewhat triumphant. My wife and I looked at each other, confused and horrified.
He must have sensed that we were nonplused. So, being of an academic bent, as we are, he began pulling out of his backpack books with titles like My Gender Workbook and Gender Outlaw, reading us long passages like the following, from Leslie Feinberg's Transgender Warriors:
"Both women's and trans liberation have presented me with two important tasks. One is to join the fight to strip away the discriminatory and oppressive values attached to masculinity and femininity. The other is to defend gender freedom -- the right of each individual to express their gender in any way they choose, whether feminine, androgynous, masculine, or any point on the spectrum between. And that includes the right to gender ambiguity and gender contradiction. It's equally important that each person have the right to define, determine, or change their sex in any way they choose whether female, male, or any point on the spectrum between. And that includes the right to physical ambiguity and contradiction."
As he talked, I tried to listen but could not escape
the sensation that I was in someone else's movie. I thought about this
young person and wondered if there was something I was missing. He had
always seemed to be a very masculine guy -- interested in girls -- who
never once could have been mistaken
for a female. He wasn't effeminate in the least,
and there seemed to be no apparent prehistory to this moment. Later, though,
I recalled the many comic strips and zines he had written featuring female
main characters. They seemed, in retrospect, to have been his alter egos.
My wife and I both consider ourselves progressive academics.
We have been willing to accept virtually any behavior from our children
-- from their experimentation with marijuana to having their sexual partners
sleep over at our house. We are a poster family for permissiveness and
have cruised fairly
comfortably from grunge through swing to goth.
I've seen my kids' hair go from brown to blue to green, as mine has gone
to gray. I followed my son as he crossed a police line and grabbed a bullhorn
at City Hall to protest budget cuts in education; worried as he came back
late from punk-rock clubs; trembled a bit as he explained that he might
be arrested for defacing (or reconstructing, as he would say) corporate
billboards. We are feminists against homophobia.
And I teach courses with titles like "Women, Nation, Empire" and "The Different
Body."
Could anyone be more of a political ally than I?
Had he announced, "I'm gay," my wife and I would have
been relatively prepared to say, "Great! Who's the lucky guy?" But transgendered?
I didn't have much of an idea then what the word meant. We asked some predictable
questions. "Are you gay?" My son laughed, "No, I love women. I'm completely
heterosexual." "So, do you want a sex-change operation?"
"No, I like my body the way it is." "So, what does this mean?" "It means,
I'm a girl. I want to wear dresses, makeup, and challenge the whole patriarchal,
bourgeois idea of gender."
My mind raced. We were having Stanley Fish and Jane Tompkins
over for dinner that night. I imagined my son swirling down the stairs,
arriving at dinner like Loretta Young in flowing chiffon. How exactly would
I explain such a phenomenon to my guests over hors d'oeuvres? As it turned
out, our son dressed
neutrally and got into an argument with Stanley
over Bosnia, not biology.
Over the next few days, my son continued to explain his metamorphosis to us: "Michel Foucault says that gender is socially constructed. So does Judith Butler." Foucault! Butler! Those were the names of scholars I teach, now being hurled like grenades at my feet. Those theoreticians believe, as I do, that such seemingly fixed and essential things as gender or disability are really pliable and plastic. It had seemed fine to accept that gender was a social construction, but now here was my child before me, attempting to carry out in principle what I had been teaching only theoretically in my courses. I suddenly felt rage toward those ivory-towered theoreticians who glibly spout gender theories. Now I was going to have to pay in humiliation and pain, in seeing my son in a dress. Thanks, Judy!
The next few days were pretty intense for my wife and me. As we sat up late discussing this alteration in our family life, we quickly passed through the phases associated with getting a fatal illness. First was denial, followed by the willing accomplices of rage and despair. Acceptance kept its reserved distance; the sticking point was the issue of wearing dresses. I thought I could logically argue my son out of that penchant. "If women are oppressed and femininity is a construct, why should you essentially reinforce or parody the feminine? Isn't that giving in to patriarchy? Reinforcing the gender binary?" As a litigious academic, I could in a pinch come up with a cogent argument.
Knowing my rhetorical strategies only too well, my son replied that to break down the binary, we had to be able to dress as we wished. In our culture, women could wear men's clothing without any opprobrium, but men could only wear women's clothing at their own peril. If a woman wears a tuxedo she's an icon, as Marlene Dietrich knew, but if a man wears a dress he's comic. Just ask Tony Curtis or Jack Lemmon.
He was right, no doubt, but no matter how rational our
discussion was, the dress became an eternal stumbling block. As some
friends of ours said later, our son had picked the one thing that we, as
progressives, couldn't accept. I continued trying to argue, "How would
you feel if you saw me wearing a
dress and makeup?" He replied, "I'd be so relieved."
I countered, "What would your roommate think?" I was figuring that his
Japanese friend, who was obsessed with technology, would be horrified.
"Oh, he's saving up his money for a sex-change operation." My last round
of armaments was quickly being depleted. One last salvo: "Well, you say
you like women. What will they think of you wearing a dress?" He
smiled like a cat with a canary in his maw and confided, "It's the greatest
way to meet women," and winked knowingly. What could I say?
By now, I was beginning to understand a bit about this
transgender issue, although I'm far from an expert. My son says that a
transgendered person is anyone who breaks the rules of the gender binary.
By his definition, people who are gay, lesbian, or bisexual are not necessarily
transgendered, since they define themselves by their sexual preference,
rather than their gender crossing. They would be transgendered
only if they attempted to break from the gender
they were assigned at birth, by redefining their identity through an act
of philosophical or political awakening, hormonal or surgical intervention,
or choice of clothing.
My son says that it's all about a person's right to choose.
He defines himself as a "transgirl." Some women may choose to define themselves
as men. And other folks may head for the shifting middle ground of gender
"variants," who like to keep things ambiguous. Inhabiting the transgender
territory are
drag queens and drag kings, "transgirls," "transboys,"
and those who vote for their identity with anything from estrogen to haircuts.
A heterosexual male could be considered transgendered if he were a cross-dresser,
although a cross-dresser is not necessarily transgendered if he only likes
to wear women's clothing but doesn't consider himself female or a gender
variant.
The possibilities are mind- (and body-) boggling. There
are relatively simple variations along the transgender continuum, including
male-to-female "post-op" transsexuals, such as Deirdre N. McCloskey, the
noted economist, or female-to-male transsexuals such as Leslie Feinberg,
the author of Stone
Butch Blues. Then there are those who adopt hormonally
and surgically the secondary sexual characteristics of the other gender
while keeping the genitalia with which they were born. There also
are bearded women, like the well-known circus performer and gender activist
Jennifer Miller. Intersexuals --
formerly known as hermaphrodites -- whose parents
"corrected" their gender, walk side-by-side in this movement with those
who managed to retain the organs with which they were born. Then,
on the genetic level, there are women who, according to their chromosomes,
should be male (they have female
genitalia, but they can't reproduce).
The old gender binary begins to look pretty Procrustean when confronted with this welter of permutations.
My son is part of what might be called a "fourth wave" in gender activism. The first wave was clearly the feminist movement, followed by the next tsunami, as gays, lesbians, and bisexuals established their identities as individuals and communities. Then came a surge of queer activism, which challenged even gay notions of what was normal. But to my son and his peers -- who are mostly under 30 -- those three sea changes now seem merely to be part of a conservative undertow.
This generation believes that earlier activists, while
challenging various kinds of gender abuses, still clung to the notion of
the criticality of gender per se. First-wave feminists, for example, never
doubted that being a woman was essential to their mission. Likewise, although
gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals challenged the notion of mandated or "normal"
sexual preference, they saw their identity as defined
by a ratio of one's gender to one's sexual choice.
That is, a lesbian could only be defined as a woman who chose another woman
as a sexual partner. Even some conservative post-operative transsexuals
cling to the gender binary, saying "I was born the wrong gender, and now
I've become the right one."
Members of the fourth wave, who like to call themselves
"trannies" (perhaps in solidarity with 60's "hippies") see challenging
the fixity of gender as their most important goal. My son reported
to me that gender is so complex that there are 100 genders, and that we
can morph through 20 of them in a
single morning. He indicts the quotidian norms
that force people to subscribe to one gender, to be legally identified
as having one, and to be forbidden to use certain social spaces by that
specific aspect of identity. Indeed, the International Bill of Gender Rights,
drafted and adopted in 1993, lists as
fundamental the prerogative to define one's gender
identity, control and change one's own body, and have access to "gendered
space."
When my wife and I asked my son why he thinks he is transgendered, his snappy retort was, "I don't know which bathroom to use." When he is wearing a dress, should he use the men's room or the women's room?
The transgendered concept allows for some interesting
family groupings. A father in a couple might undergo sexual reassignment
surgery and thereby become a lesbian, if he remains with his wife. Or a
cross-gendered bisexual can pair off with an intersexual lesbian. A cross-dressing
male can live with a post-op male-to-female and appear to fit nicely into
the prototype of the typical American family. The
possibilities are limitless. They make Ozzie and
Harriet look like something from the late Devonian period, and Ellen DeGeneres's
coming out seem as staid as that of a debutante.
I understood all this intellectually, but I was taking a fair amount of time to process it emotionally. My wife initially insisted on an N.I.M.H. -- Not In My House -- policy in regard to cross-dressing. That stance resulted partly from embarrassment and shame about how friends and family might perceive our son if they knew the truth.
Somewhat conveniently, the grandparents had already transmogrified to that genderless beyond, so at least we wouldn't have to explain the situation to them. Our 16-year-old daughter thought the whole thing was kind of cool and couldn't understand why we were so upset. "Some boys in my school come to class in skirts or wearing lipstick, and we think they're sexy." My brother, a financial analyst living in the suburbs, was blase. His college-age son was open-minded, having lived his four university years in a frat house, where he had no doubt seen worse.
We were uncertain about what to say to our friends. The artistic types were intrigued, and even offered some fetching outfits, if needed. One male friend was judgmental, and said our son was manipulating us. But that same friend sheepishly admitted that, when his wife bought new high-heeled shoes, he had to be the first to wear them at home. Another friend, who is part of a gay couple, confessed that his dream was to be married in a wedding gown, something his more conventional partner just would not hear of. In fact, a lot of folks stepped up to our confessional with Oprah-like stories of their own journeys into the backrooms of sexuality, gender, and fashion.
In the midst of all this turmoil, or because of it, my son decided to go to an indie-rock concert in Washington State. He would take a Greyhound bus and camp out. He asked me to help him get organized, which is how I ended up in the Kmart as his shopping consultant. He packed a few dresses into his backpack, along with his other clothing, and left. All of us felt relieved.
We began to get phone calls from bus stations scattered across the country. At first our son was friendly, but one late-night call from Fargo turned angry quickly. "I've been thinking, and I'm really upset that you won't accept me for who I am." My groggy response was that I was doing the best I could. "That's not good enough. I can't believe that you, of all people, who teach about the rights of people with disabilities, people of color, working-class people, can't accept this. These are my people! They are being discriminated against, cast out, and you can't accept it?"
For the first time, I felt that he was completely right. I had no counterargument. Whether I liked it or not, a disenfranchised and despised group was in need of support; what made it difficult to accept was the fact that my son was in that group. I had to confront my own prejudices and realize that I was a bigot. I, like many of my peers, thought that a man in a dress was either humorous or pathetic, as so many episodes of Monty Python or Benny Hill have suggested. It was true that I didn't know whether to laugh or cry about my son.
My son asked that I read some of the books he had brought
home, and I agreed. I also ordered some books through Amazon.com. (Then,
when I logged on, I got helpful messages like, "If you liked Transvestism:
A Handbook, you'll like Bound and Gagged.") I not only read through the
material, but,
since I would be teaching a course in the fall
called "The Different Body," I decided then to put some of the books in
my syllabus. (It is interesting to me that my reaction, as an academic,
was to teach about what was mystifying and edifying me.)
I've just about gotten used to seeing my child in women's clothing. At first I experience a confusing, cognitively dissonant moment, but then I remember that he is the child I've known for years, with the same brio for life he's always had, the same excitement over his ideas, commitment to fairness and justice, and love for us. The only difference is that he's in a skirt. I remember my mother's agony over my long hair in the 1960's -- how she asked me not to come to her place of business because she was embarrassed, and how much that hurt me. I knew as a parent, and as an activist, that I could not legitimately reproduce that rejection.
Our life has gone on. My son announced that he wanted to bring his girlfriend, a "bidyke" as he described her, home for the holiday season. I learned that the term "dyke" has now been freed up from its dependence on sexual preference, and is an operative word to describe a strong woman. When she arrived, she seemed a bit androgynous, but not remotely butch. And she wore a prom dress out one night. We all liked her, and it was a memorable Christmas.
Meanwhile, my graduate course on "The Different Body"
went very well. The body in question was a little more different than it
had been in the previous year's version. But the students were barely fazed
by the transgendered component of the course. They were blase, even when
I told them about my son or showed them pictures that I thought were pretty
shocking -- like a photograph of Tala Candra Brandeis by Loren Cameron
titled "Biology Is Not Our Destiny," depicting a nude person with long,
flowing hair, breasts, tattoos, and a penis. It seemed to be all
in a day's work for this generation of cultural-studies adepts, brought
up as they had been with RuPaul and The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen
of the Desert. I
shared with the class my son's zine entitled Boy
Is Girl and gave them his e-mail address so they could converse with him
about these subjects. My son was pleased with the correspondence, and the
students were, too.
The story is not over. In the months since his announcement,
my son's attitudes toward some issues have shifted. He has come into conflict
with more-conservative elements in the trannie community who do not agree
with his radical politics. He has had to deal with the fact that
some people within that community do not regard him as truly transgendered,
because he hasn't taken hormones or had an operation. He is evolving a
position that I have come to respect and from which I have learned a great
deal. In many ways, he occupies a similar position to the one I do in disability
studies. I am not a person with disabilities, and I have to negotiate that
liminal status on a regular basis. In addition, both he and I are
against the narrowness of certain kinds of identity
politics and see our goal as opening up the question of identity through
a notion of the mutability of the body. So, we talk a lot about the ways
in which our interests intersect. I've helped him with his zines, and he's
helped me with my course.
As an academic, my job is to learn from the world. And if that world comes into my house in women's clothing, spouting Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, then I have to learn from that. As a father, my pleasure is to love and accept my children. When those two roles come together, in a kind of serendipitous confluence, one must be quick to recognize the opportunity that presents itself. My child and I have grown closer through what might have been a terrible conflict, one that in some families might have been the end of the line. What made a better scenario possible was that same intellectual desire to learn, to know, and to encourage that has been behind all my teaching and scholarship.
The other day, my son announced that he wanted my wife
and me to refer to him as our "daughter." He asked that we not use masculine
pronouns or nouns to describe him. I told him that I probably could not
find it in myself to call him my "daughter," that my sense of the English
language was that it was not sufficiently flexible, nor was I, to accomplish
that gender purification of my linguistic practice. This was
finally a moment, I felt, when the old binary
dog couldn't learn new transgendered tricks. We got into an argument, and
he hurled Judith Butler at me again. She was getting to be my nemesis.
My son knew that I was writing this article, and he approved. But when I told him that it would be impossible for me to write this piece without using masculine pronouns, he was upset. He suggested that I use "s/he" or "ze," and I responded that I was sure the Chronicle style sheet was pretty limited in that regard. After some discussion, he said, "OK, but just do it at the end of the essay." So I told her I would. After all, I figured, I wasn't losing a son, I was gaining a daughter.
Lennard J. Davis is a professor of English at the State University of New York at Binghamton. His most recent book is My Sense of Silence: Memoirs of a Childhood with Deafness (University of Illinois Press, 2000). ________________________________________________________________
Chronicle subscribers can read this story on the Web at this address:
If you would like to have complete access to The Chronicle's
Web
site, a special subscription offer can be found at:
Use the code D00S when ordering.
_________________________________________________________________
You may visit The Chronicle as follows:
* via the World-Wide Web, at http://chronicle.com
* via telnet at chronicle.com
_________________________________________________________________
Copyright 2000 by The Chronicle of Higher Education